The modification of our perception of power via electrical reactance.

We modify the DC conventional ideology of current flow and we superimpose its simultaneous split to travel in opposite directions at the same time labeling one flow north monopolar magnetism and the opposite direction becomes south monopolar magnetism. This is Edward Leedskalnin's view of magnetism.

Then we apply the concept of the alternation of current, contributed by Nikola Tesla, to this situation by alternating both bidirectional simultaneous flows of south pole and north pole monopolar magnetic fields. Although this looks confusing, it gives us a ripe opportunity to manipulate the prime mover without changing the value of the prime mover.

Instead, we apply the alternation of the restrictive force of reactive impedance per half cycle upon this confusing situation and modify that restrictive force by self compounding it in order to squeeze the flow of current per half cycle resulting in the magnification of the flow of current during each subsequent (alternate) half cycle.

I wish to believe, or I choose to believe(!), that this is what the Ammann brothers did in 1921 and this is what Nikola Tesla did 10 years later to achieve over unity by the amplification of power at a cost which is less than the cost of the prime mover -- which in both cases amounts to no more than the cost of energy which is already prevalent in the environment capable of powering a crystal radio design which was prevalent a century ago (1 part per billionth or 1 part per trillionth of a watt).

It is far easier to manipulate the accumulation of reactance, over time, than it is to manipulate the real power emanating from a prime mover. This is why Gabriel Kron could perform such magical feats of reducing or increasing energy without actually doing so.

This is because our perception of energetic reality is predicated upon the lens of perception imposed upon our perception of electrical energy by electrical reactance ALL of the TIME (whether we appreciate this fact or not!).

This is why the conservation of energy is not a lie so much as it is irrelevant to any discussion of the topic of that colloquialism known as “free energy” because reactance trumps energy in all cases and without exception. In other words, energy has to bend its proverbial knee and humble itself before it’s master because it is a slave to electrical reactance.

We cannot have the output of energy without some input of energy, but we cannot have over unity without the manipulation of electrical reactance. This makes perpetual motion possible (and devices predicated upon this principle) so long as the gains made by electrical reactance are greater than the losses due to entropy.

Since we are creatures who are also composed of energy, not only is our perception of the over unity the result of a shift in our perspective, but other energies such as the energy within the circuit itself has been altered in its perception of itself. This is why our measuring devices are convinced that over unity has occurred yet we scratch our heads ignorant of how tenuous is the nature of energetic reality. It is not written in stone… It is written in the flexibility of electrical reactance.