The fallacies of physics and of electrical engineering are populated by gaps in our awareness on the subject of electricity.

It’s not what we know about electricity that is at fault so much as what we don’t know and we don’t care to know about it either. We don’t care to investigate; we don’t care to question authority. What we want is to get paid and get ahead in our job and that’s it!

Meanwhile, our knowledge suffers for ignorance.

A critic…

Not even wrong.

Both Vs in V squared have to be the same V - otherwise it is [without merit]; invoking negative resistance will not help you, as you would realise if you but knew what negative resistance actually is.

You fundamentally misunderstand the work of Oliver Heaviside - yes, he was largely self taught and a bit weird, but he had the great virtue of understanding what he was on about; being an actual genius is so much more useful than imagining that you are so much smarter than everyone else.

If free energy is a thing, let us see a demonstration; otherwise (and it is otherwise) STFU!

 

 

Vinyasi

· Just now

 

Correct. Both V’s in V squared have to be the same voltage to insure the domination of the Conservation of Energy and of Thermodynamic Entropy across all domains of electrical engineering including the domain of reactance enumerated by complex numbers in which the input voltage is purposefully and intentionally fed to the circuit with an amplitude in excess of the requirements of the load to insure the suppression (via voltage regulation) of the excessive exponential self-feeding growth of the imaginary portion of the complex numeric fields surrounding reactive components.

Otherwise, if we were to feed a feeble input of a nano watt or pico watt sine wave into a properly designed circuit lacking throughput (discouraging real current and encouraging a phase separation between voltage and current of 180 degrees oscillating as a standing wave), then the imaginary portion of the complex enumeration of fields of reactance would be encouraged to self amplify at various exponential rates (unhindered and out of reach of suppressive levels of real voltage) and we will have succeeded at generating a precursor to free energy in the form of a special case of electrical reactance whose discovery is discouraged by the pervasive belief that Thermodynamic Entropy rules everything and that there is nothing wrong with applying the Law of the Conservation of Energy upon non-energetic reactance.

Under the encouragement of the aforementioned setup lacking an obvious throughput (etc), whenever the imaginary portion of the complex enumeration of reactive fields becomes squared, it continues to exponentially amplify a current whose polarization is opposed to the applied voltage by 180 degrees. Meanwhile, the real portion of the complex enumeration of reactive fields continues to reduce due to the Laws of Entropic Thermodynamics and the cross multiplication of the real versus the imaginary portions continues to amplify the complex portion of the complex enumeration of reactive fields. This last consideration will continue to encourage a preponderance of the imaginary portion over the real portion of the complex enumeration of reactive fields which will also serve as a precursor to additional amplifications of inverse current.

This growth of inverse current fosters the generation of the precursor to free energy. All that is needed (in the simplest example) is a resistor to reassemble the opposing phases of voltage and current into useful wattage of positive one power factor.